Argentine judge orders halt to Falklands oil project as tensions with Britain rise – WRAL

By SERGIO FARELLA and ISABEL DEBRE — Associated Press

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — An Argentine federal judge on Wednesday ordered British and Israeli companies to stop developing an oilfield off the Falkland Islands, opening a new legal front in the decades-old sovereignty dispute between Argentina and Britain that Argentine President Javier Milei has revived in recent weeks.

The injunction by Judge Mariel Borruto, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press, targets the Sea Lion oil project 220 kilometers (140 miles) north of the British-controlled archipelago in the South Atlantic, barring drilling, offshore installations and port construction until Argentine authorities can conduct an environmental review and issue a decision.

But in practice, Wednesday’s order is unlikely to halt progress on the project. Judge Borruto acknowledged that enforcement “depends on international cooperation and the conduct” of the two companies, Israel’s Navitas Petroleum and Britain’s Rockhopper Exploration, which have already vowed to press ahead with the project despite Milei’s threats of tougher sanctions against them and other companies operating around the islands.

Rockhopper declined to comment, and Navitas did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the injunction.

With its commercial oil production expected to start in 2028, Sea Lion has raised the stakes of a territorial dispute that led Britain and Argentina to a short and bloody war in 1982.

For the territory’s roughly 3,500 residents, the oilfield promises to transform an economy long dependent on fishing. For Argentina, which calls the islands the Malvinas, the project would allow foreign companies to extract oil riches it regards as its own. Its claim to the archipelago, roughly 480 kilometers (300 miles) off its coast, is enshrined in the constitution and woven into national identity, drawing support across the country’s political divisions.

U.S. President Donald Trump, a close ally of Argentina’s radical libertarian leader, has brought new uncertainty to the dispute in recent weeks. Citing Britain’s lack of support for his war against Iran, he has suggested that Washington could change its historically neutral stance on the islands’ sovereignty.

Speaking to reporters in Dublin on Saturday, Trump again expressed skepticism that Britain would be able to retake the Falklands as it did after Argentina’s military dictatorship invaded in 1982, saying, “I don’t know if they’re going to be willing to travel that far.”

Milei seized on what he called “winds of change” following Trump’s comments earlier this month, using a Sept. 3 national address to announce measures against companies developing oilfields around the islands. He warned that the projects posed a “clear and urgent danger” to Argentina’s sovereignty claim and pledged to use all “diplomatic, economic, judicial and legal tools” to defend it.

His administration is now preparing legislation to broaden sanctions against companies involved in oil projects around the islands and filed three criminal complaints against Tel Aviv-listed Navitas and nine other companies and their executives, accusing them of violating Argentine law by pursuing oil operations without the country’s authorization. It’s unclear what impact the charges have on the project.

Britain has responded to the Argentine government’s legal campaign with defiance. It argues that the people who live in the Falklands should determine its status, citing the results of a 2013 referendum in which islanders overwhelmingly voted to remain a British territory.

“Argentine domestic law does not apply within the Islands,” the British government said Tuesday in guidance aimed at reassuring businesses operating there.

Wednesday’s ruling issued by the federal court in Argentina’s southernmost province of Tierra del Fuego stems from a separate civil lawsuit brought by environmental lawyers and veterans of the 1982 war seeking to prevent environmental damage from the project. The complaint cites ecological threats ranging from chemical pollution and underwater noise to ship traffic and potential oil spills.

Borruto warned that allowing drilling and construction to proceed could alter the marine ecosystem in ways that would be difficult to reverse.

“The risk is neither hypothetical nor remote,” she wrote, noting that work on the project’s infrastructure had already begun.

___

Associated Press writer Débora Rey contributed to this report.

Copyright 2026 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.